On the 2nd, the National Development and Reform Commission of China disclosed the anti-monopoly “penalty†for the Zhejiang insurance industry of 110 million yuan (RMB, the same below).
From automobile manufacturers to parts suppliers to auto insurance industry, the Anti-monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission has investigated the monopoly of the auto industry involving upstream, midstream and downstream, and achieved comprehensive coverage.
Li Qing, deputy director of the Price Supervision and Inspection and Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission, said in an exclusive interview with the China News Service. The NDRC's anti-monopoly law enforcement mainly focused on new car insurance in auto insurance. The reason for checking the Zhejiang insurance industry first is the media reports and some reports.
It is worth noting that the National Development and Reform Commission's decision on the punishment of the above-mentioned cases has already been delivered to the enterprises involved in the case as early as the end of 2013. The official disclosure of the complete case has its unique considerations.
The first is to respond to selective law enforcement challenges. Recently, many internationally renowned companies such as Qualcomm [microblogging], Microsoft [microblogging], Audi, and Mercedes-Benz have been subjected to anti-monopoly investigations. Some foreign media have issued doubts about China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies supporting domestic enterprises and launching selective anti-monopoly against foreign companies.
In this regard, Shi Jianzhong, an expert of the State Council’s Anti-Monopoly Committee and a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, told the China News Service that as long as a brief review of the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law over the past six years, it can be found that companies that have been subjected to anti-monopoly investigations have their own country. Enterprises also have foreign companies. He stressed that China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies have been practicing and constantly improving the "competitive neutrality" law enforcement concept - in the face of anti-monopoly law, all enterprises are equal.
The case disclosed by the Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission also confirmed the statement of Shi Jianzhong. Li Qing told the China News Agency that the foreign companies such as Zhejiang Libao Insurance Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Aihe Yiyisheng and Property Insurance Zhejiang Branch did not participate in the monopoly agreement due to the strict requirements of the headquarters for anti-monopoly compliance. Finally, I was able to stay out of it.
“The above-mentioned penalty decision occurred before a series of anti-monopoly investigations related to foreign companies recently.†Li Qing pointed out that this is enough to show that competition neutrality is the principle that Chinese law enforcement agencies have always followed, rather than the face that has been developed after hearing the doubts. engineering.
Another point of view of the official disclosure of the "new ticket" is the first full publication of the administrative penalty responsibility letter, which directly refers to the outside world's questioning the transparency of China's anti-monopoly law enforcement.
Su Hua, an associate researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has previously written that after systematic interviews with officials, companies surveyed and their lawyers observed in recent years, the Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission has always focused on ensuring transparency and the defense of administrative counterparts. Right to ensure that the program is legal.
"There was no full disclosure of the administrative penalty responsibility letter, but we did not want it, but the company has concerns." Li Qing told the China News Service reporter that due to concerns about the disclosure of trade secrets and damage to their reputation, companies that received anti-monopoly "penalties" generally hoped. Officials should not disclose information too much. "For us, there is nothing that cannot be announced in accordance with the law."
She stressed that the publication of the full text of the relevant penalty decision this time is an attempt to openly enforce information and accept social supervision. "In the future, we will further increase our openness and accept social supervision."
In addition to responding to selective law enforcement and low transparency, another important signal of the case disclosed by the NDRC's Antimonopoly Service is the monopoly of industry associations.
Compared with the insurance companies that were “sentencing†according to the “1%†lower limit, the Zhejiang Insurance Industry Association was fined a maximum of 500,000 yuan.
Li Qing revealed that in this case, the Zhejiang Insurance Industry Association not only organized enterprises to meet fixed prices, but also specifically criticized enterprises that did not implement prices, and was therefore identified as “very seriousâ€. She stressed that some industry associations still work in the way of the planned economic system, which makes it easy to become the organizer and planner of the price monopoly.
The design of middle through hole is easy to install, Barrel Damper is usually used in small spaces. ABD barrel dampers are the perfect solution for a wide range of applications. Barrel dampers are widely used in automobile interior decoration, household electric appliances, furniture, hidden socket, etc. Our dampers can make the movement of structures soft, quiet and safe to mitigate the impact, avoid the damage, increase the mechanical life, reduce noise, and improve product quality.
NOTE:
1. Please contact the corresponding product engineer for specific torque products.
2. Max. rotation speed: 50r/min
3. Max. circle rate: Clockwise180 °, 180 ° anti-clockwise for 1 cycle
4. Operating temperature: -10~50℃
5. Storage temperature:-30~60℃
Applied torque:(T)
Test Temperature:23+/-5℃
Rotating speed:20r/min
Durability test Method:Clockwise 180 °, 180 ° anti-clockwise
Rotating speed:20r/min
Test Frequency:1cycle/min
Test Temperature:23±5℃
Durability test cycle:10000 cycle
Test result criteria: Store in the room temperature for 24 hours or more after the test, recording to the torque T=T±30%T.
Barrel Damper
Barrel Damper,Plastic Dampers,Manual Barrel Damper,Toilet Seat Damper,Plastic Barrel Rotary Damper
Shenzhen ABD Equipment Co., Ltd. , http://www.abddamper.com